Nyco,
Excellent point!
I agree that most open source software projects have a commercial element, and it can be difficult to determine whether a project is primarily non-commercial. In cases where a company has a dual open source / commercial licensing model and that company has control over the product releases, they are unlikely to qualify for a free license. When companies offer services around an open source project, the line gets a bit fuzzy. For example, we might offer a free license to the Linux kernel project, but not to Novell for Suse, since they have a services business and commercial offerings for their Linux product.
In general, we try to be flexible and do the right thing for each case. For companies running a commercial business based on open source, we would expect for them to pay for a license like any other business customer. We want to use our free license program to support open source projects that have limited resources and rely primarily on volunteers.
I understand. I don't have any experience thus any advice for this kind of licensing issue, but have you considered hosting free/opensource software projets? Have you considered the Affero GPL? http://www.affero.org/oagpl.html
xmpp:nyco@jabber.fr
> 2. It must be primarily non-commercial.
Most of the open source software projects don't comply with this rule...